Thursday, April 9, 2009

Hypnosis ... Milton model

Hypnosis

Milton model

Many basic presuppozitsii NLP is based on examining the work of Eriksson. He respected the client's unconscious and believed that all behavior is based on the positive intentions that people make the best choice from the options available to them and have the resources to implement the desired changes, etc. Skill Eriksson is at the heart of many NLP techniques to establish and maintain repeat (tuning and maintenance).

Using the metamodel, we turn to the specific details for the reconstruction of the distorted, and generalized down information, so we use the metamodel displays of trance. When using the Milton-model we have, instead, carry out merger to create new syntheses,

"Enlarge" questions "dissociated problem state resources and higher levels (metaresursy). Source of treatment you will find the "top".

In trans

General Information - Consolidation - The overview

Questions:

"This is an example of what?"

"For what purpose ...?"

"What are your intentions?"

"What's more important you get if you have these?"

Metamodel

Outside trance

Specificity - Details - Unbundling

Questions: "What are examples of this?"

"What is it?" Any question metamodel - another format omissions and distortions. For specific information when using the Milton-model, we climb up to the general information - to a more general picture. Milton-model - a mirror image of the metamodel (Figure 10.1).

In this model, you will find a lot of distortions, generalizations and omissions. In it, we deliberately use the language so as to enable the client to fill in missing details. We give the client an open frame and a context to his subconscious activated internal search. Common phrases encourage people during this search to enter the trance. Therefore, the language patterns of Milton-model support this process.

Milton-model - is a mirror reflection of the metamodel, we introduce the person in trans using a violation of the metamodel. We do not ask questions - questions prompted raised consciousness I (in a state of "aptaym").

The ultimate goal


"What is important in the implementation of the G?" "What will give you a D?" "What do you get as a result of the G?"


Sample.

(Start from the bottom

and move up.)

"What a resource state gives you?" "This means that I can be myself".

The intention of the G


"What is important in implementation?" "What would you?" "What do you get as a result of implementation?"


"What makes you a lesser sense of nervousness?" "It allows me to be a resource".

Intent


"What is important in the B?" "What will give you a B?" "What do you get as a result of the B?"


"What you get by taking a hand in some case? "I am less nervous".

Intent B


"What is your positive intention in the A?"


"What is your positive intention to smoke?" "I find the class for hands".

Behavior A


"What will give you a?" "What you get as a result of the A?"


Behavior - smoking cigarettes, the result - no smoking.

Below is an example of creative use violations Meta I to the introduction of rights in the state of trance.

Milton-model - is a mirror reflection of the metamodel, we introduce the person in trans using a violation of the metamodel.

You know?

Right?

Do you not know?

Is not it?

How can you not?

"I know (read thoughts) that you started to receive new knowledge (nominalizatsiya) a huge number of important questions for you (nonspecific noun). Learn, to really learn well (lost performativ) ... By acquiring new knowledge (presuppozitsiya), you have already begun to change (cause-effect relationships), and I do not know what feelings you have that causes ... but you can change. The fact that you have already started to change in such a graceful way, means that treatment (the integrated equivalent) started. You may be worrying these changes (presuppozitsiya) how you feel or just how you talk to themselves. Since the changes (nominalizatsiya) started, which means that all (Quantor commonality) other areas requiring treatment may also begin to change (all of the offer - a comprehensive equivalent). You can change the (modal operator of possibility and non-verb), as required (modal operator is required osti). Change - more or less the right decision (performativ lost, incomplete comparison) "

HYPNOSIS