Historical background of the new code.
The first half of the 80th years, I was in a strange situation. When I contemplate the world of NLP, created Bendlerom and me, then said a few serious things I care to:
1. It was a lot of extremely well-trained practitioners of NLP, the ability to create these wonders (on the possibilities of other systems work on the changes) to work with clients. However, it is obvious that they never came to mind (or perhaps they simply decided not to do so) to use these patterns for yourself. Thus, I had a feeling that many of them incongruence, ie, in some areas of their personal and professional life had been absolutely no room for choice, which they assiduously helped to create another.
2. Most of these people were mainly focused on the development of seminars on the application of NLP in various areas (I am considered as a slight variation of the baseline development), but very little attention has been given the primary objective of NLP - Modeling.
3. The focus for many of them were ultra-fast search for solutions to the problems with which the client came to them, regardless of the situation they arise. It seemed that these people had no interest in such broad issues as aesthetics, ethics, social and political issues. In doing so, I could not find them no desire to use a proactive approach to these important aspects of human activity.
I have therefore decided to develop what became known in NLP as a new code, some projects which participated Judith Deloze.
I set a goal to develop an approach that would be effectively represented by the lead during the course, but only on condition that he kongruenten what is taught. At the same time, I realized that the reformation of existing developments in NLP gave me an opportunity to correct some errors in the design approved Bendlerom and me in a fit of enthusiasm, with the formation of the classical NLP.
I understand that I failed in an attempt to achieve its first objective: there is not much congruence of people who earn a living "teaching" New Air. But time will tell whether I have succeeded in achieving the second goal ...
The development of some of the classic code of NLP in the New Code.
Now the new code (regardless of the original objectives) is a natural, albeit radical, extension of certain variables, built-in standard formats NLP. In particular, first, there were several sustainable development principles:
1) The need to verify the expected changes after calibration, to verify that the change occurred;
2) consistent use of past experiences as a source of high productivity states which can be used as a resource in the change;
3) The work-free - an important part of the process of change;
4) the use of contextual anchors for quick call and maintain the necessary resources of the state (to adjust to the future);
5) the relative lack of interest in understanding the content changes on the part of both client and consultant - this is due to the rejection of the origins of the study changes the behavior of (reasons), that is, avoiding any "archaeological" Action.
In the New code of these variables are appreciated. For example, the so-called state of the resource are created through direct involvement in client activities, often in the form of the game, which in itself creates a state of high productivity, which, strangely enough, has no history, no substance. This is just a game, which activates the neurological circuits that serve as the basis for changes in the context of pre-selected customer. The structure of the game designed to ensure that certain characteristics typical of a state of high productivity. Specifications for a new code, compared with a classical source, drastically reduced, and this reduces the threshold for the development of skills for people who wish to apply.
New code.
One of the fundamental policies underlying the new code, was to develop a set of activities or games, which naturally led to the activation of human states of high productivity, regardless of content.
In a critical analysis of a classical code, we have identified flaws in the design, which fixes the new code. These deficiencies are most contrary to the format shestishagovogo refreyminga, is, according to our assumption, the bridge between the classical and the new code. In the New we find the following code:
1) assumes that the unconscious client is responsible for the selection of the most important elements of change: the desired condition, resources, or new forms of behavior;
2) the unconscious is actively involved in all the major steps for change;
3) The new behavior must satisfy the original positive intention: to change behavior;
4) changes occur not at the level of conduct and levels of status and intentions. In addition, the use of new techniques of code that provide access to the subconscious, leading to a state of ignorance *.
[* In a state of ignorance of the person off the secondary filters of perception, refleksiruyuschie continuous flow of perception and sootnosyaschie the information is already available - that is, creating a "knowledge." This process of continuous reflection (as a rule that supports the internal dialogue) holds rights in a stable state of mind and prevents the establishment of rapid change unconscious and unconscious learning in the simulation.]
A partial list of patterns of a new code
Below is a partial list of patterns in the new code:
1. Multiple positions of perception, especially the description of the three positional (first, second and third position).
2. Explicit freyming (as a result, the intention, the effects of the relevant issues).
3. Relations organizing, including the hierarchy of logical levels.
4. Time [s] e line (initially developed as an exercise for joint and Grindera Diltsa at the beginning of 80th years).
5. A set of linguistic tools to reduced issues freymingom explicit and more subtle verbal characteristics, termed "description", "interpretation" and "assessment".
6. Universal format for the changes of the four steps ranging from the third step (stimulator of the state of high productivity - the game). A set of games, including "Alphabet", NASA, options exercises "springboard" Roger tabby, etc.
7. Promotion (signs, automatic movement to the preferred state).
8. Multiple forms of involuntary signals between consciousness and subconsciousness.
9. Harakterologicheskie adjectives.
"I am especially pleased when my experience far outstrips my ability to consciously represent effective strategies for their own behavior. Please note that this is - a special form of activity which has some characteristics in common with simulations, but differs from it in several aspects. In design there is no external models to be copied. I come to the new pattern by partially informed and, more importantly, unconscious changes in certain parameters of the experience. I'm using the feedback until you have reached the criteria (that is, until you will be satisfied that achieved the desired results). And then I have developed due to my approach ".
HYPNOSIS
Posts
