Lovely. Judith Deloze.
Thank you for what you have found time in your busy lives to come here. What this group is here, seriously reminds me of getting his own way of NLP. Not many I saw in the world to places where the spirit of unity enelperov creates what he creates here. This is really great and you can be proud of. I even want to cry, so this is consistent with my vision.
I have been asked to write something for the magazine, and I want to write to you to read: "The discipline known as NLP, was born, before she gave the name of Commonwealth citizens - representatives of different sciences (Bendler Richard, John Grinder, Leslie Cameron, Mary BES Megus, David Gordon, Robert Dilts, and I - this is a short list). We have led the general curiosity about how we know anything, as we learn how we communicate and how we are changing. And how can we influence the process of change and the optimal ecological putem.Patterny NLP were not known to us, they were in the process of learning ".
I want you to be aware of how special is that you are doing. You can meet regularly and develop their knowledge in this group because it is really about the development of knowledge in a group of people with different models of the world. Bravo! I will tell the whole world that you are doing.
In order to join.
I would like to tell a little about yourself. My main occupation - the study of religion and anthropology. I became enthusiastic about NLP at a time when the book "The structure of magic" was another manuscript. My friend John Grinder brought it to me and said: "Read it and tell me what you think about it". I read the book and said: "You know, this is really a wonderful thing for people to structure their experience. It really could help people in understanding the things that happen to them in the world and they can not express. This is indeed an excellent model ".
It was a special place - the University of Santa Cruz, which enabled us to start what we do. A dean of the university was a dream - the creation of the context in which ideas from different disciplines and different models of the world could come together creatively to create new opportunities. Today I would like to talk about the idea of Excellence in NLP, especially in respect of the New Code of NLP. "New Coding" - here's how I call it. This is another description that contains seven different parts. Also I would like to touch upon the development of NLP System.
Old Coding
It is the first description of NLP, or as I call him, "NLP old code", which appeared as a result of the development of linguistics, Gestalt therapy and systems theory. It includes the linguistic patterns (meta-model) and their interaction with the underlying structures of experience, which in turn includes the idea of representative systems, submodalnostyah, strategies, intentions, and the division of behavior, and all the changes that we are able to do with these codes for the establishment of techniques, whether shestishagovy refreyming, change personal history, yakorenie or visually-kinesteticheskaya dissociation.
Much was due to answer the question: "How do you know?". This is the main issue. People are saying: "I am going to make the presentation this evening". And we asked: "How do you know about this?" We have started to pay attention to the fact that they move the eyes, interested in what happens. And they said: "Hy, I can see yourself reaching for the submission". And we discovered that they actually saw something. We have begun to associate patterns of physiology, language and the internal condition. When you understand how patterns of use, you can create your own patterns.
People armed with only the meta-model began indiscriminately meta-model the other. They could not understand why they lose their friends! They saw how the technology of NLP, as a procedure, which I call the ritual. In snatches of the ritual is not wisdom. We thought John Grinderom: "How can we make people start thinking about where wisdom?" And, thus, in 1984, came to light "Turtles to the very bottom: Prerequisites of personal genius".
The new encoding.
The second description, or "New Coding" a result of various studies: John Grindera and my understanding of NLP, Gregory Beytsona work on information theory and biology, the books of Carlos Castaneda on Ways Yaki, and our experience of the African game on a drum, dancing, singing and stories rasskazyvaniya in the Congo. So, we took these ideas and asked: "How else can we describe what is already defined in another code?" We have proposed a series of seven items.
1. Status.
One description - this state. Just consider the idea of separate state. Which state you have to develop that model excellence? We asked what components are included in good condition for the simulation, and what can we do to be able to choose their state and manage their condition in problem situations, just as in the situation and development in a creative situation.
This was the first part. And then we started to observe people who have done interesting work on modeling, as Carlos Castaneda. What was the common y them is the use of the state, which I call nerk-nerk. This condition "ignorance", when you do not know ... while. You accumulate the information in the system. Do you have any intuitive guesses, but you do not know what you know. Once you y appears intuitive guess, somewhere inside you know something that has not yet entered the consciousness. Pattern has not yet been demonstrated. But if you wait and the pattern will be repeated, he will come.
This is related to the idea of Gregory Beytsona about two types of knowledge. There is knowledge in part of our consciousness and there is also a cognitive knowledge that we know. There is also an understanding of the interaction between the two.
When modeliruesh skill, beginning to see some patterns. One pattern - is to use the idea of managing a condition that y man has the tools to maintain certain qualities in his breathing, physiology, and the representation of beliefs, which supports the results of a demonstration of skill or excellence in the world. For example, when you sit, sit down and straining the shoulders of the curve. Let your shoulders go up and pressed to the ears. Typically stress. What's your breathing? Easy Does this condition? Do you think this is useful for physiology education? Where to focus your attention? What beliefs about teaching your support in this state? Now, change the posture, gently move or can even stand up and sit down again. Look for a stable comfortable posture. Walk all over the body and remove the excess voltage, breathe, and once again ask yourself these questions. What is the state more conducive to learning?
Another pattern that we found it, how to establish contact with the model of superior quality. This requires a condition where a person throws the filters internal dialogue, fovialnogo view and excess voltage. This is a very clear situation, which is still sometimes referred to as trans-aptaym (uptime - in value. Here and now). This is a state in which our attention provzaimodeystvovalo model, whose patterns are to be placed in our neurology and later learned to build transmission code. The state of modeling - it is quiet, without the internal dialogue, the use of peripheral rather than fovialnogo view.
2. Interaction of conscious and unconscious.
What else did these people? Hy, y have been a really interesting interaction between the conscious and unconscious, what we call the attention of 1-m and 2-m focus. Whatever small or was that part, which we call consciousness, and that gives feedback most part, it affects the quality of this interaction, with the understanding that it is impossible to get there, that endless process of development, which improves over time.
Who among you performed what is called "The shift in the second position?" Most of the group. Do you remember the first time in comparison with the last time? Strongly Does the quality differ? Can you say that every time you do this, the quality improved? That is what I say. So, what tool you have to continually develop this collaboration? How many of you meditating? How many of you praying? Who among you is samogipnozom? Which of you is doing something that requires sure and fair participation of all reason, as to Gregory Beytson?
Gregory also admitted that the master in any field possess highly-developed high-quality interaction between the conscious and unconscious resources. According to him, the master knows when to use stress cognitive thinking conscious mind and when to use a more relaxed mind of creative unconscious. Consider the metaphor of Milton Eriksson on a horse and rider. The horse - that is our unconscious, and the rider - our consciousness. Of course, all of us who went on the horse, knows what happens when the rider wants to move in one direction, and a horse in another. None of them will not achieve its goals, while spending lots of time and effort.
So, it was the second part of the skill and the new encoding.
3. The balance between practice and spontaneity.
The third idea was: How do I balance between the practice and spontaneity? It is also very closely related to the interaction of conscious and unconscious. NLP - it is about getting results. Do y you so that your result is not to get the result? Or if I go through the southern border to Mexico, I would say: "Judy is very important to visit the country Nedeyaniya". Y Do you understand this life, to say: "Yes, I have been studying these rituals, called GLP. I study these techniques, these tools, I have been visiting places like this, and practice them. I am, I have developed in the world. "? And comes a time when it is so deeply installed in your behavior that you release control and operate a completely spontaneous. At this point you do not looks: "So, wondering whether their eyes move to the right-up, and wonder whether they are going to go down and left?" There are only a systematic cycle. I like the metaphor of aikido. You're on mate, and you practice and practice, and when you go to a meeting with your partner, you do not become a stop and talk to himself. You will not even be the decision taken in advance of what tactic to use. It's really you even can not know this, yet you do not vzaimodeystvuesh with a partner, because it's dance with the outside world.
4. Positions of perception
Number four - this is the position of perception. Gregory said: "required two to see one". And we said: "So really, three". At that time, we met with Robert Diltsom, and he told us: "I have recently done an interesting thing. I had a man with a phobia. I asked him to stand in the position of the perception of what he feared. Then an enormous thing. This snake was a really scared ". So, we all were one and the same. And then we began to ponder that there is my position, there is your position, and there is a third or neutral position, where everything is just information. I discovered that for some of us, it is difficult. We moved there, and we do not want to say: "Hy, this is nonsense, I can not believe that I did it". This means to give the meaning of a pattern on a different level. Now I can see a much larger part of the world and understand it, from another position, in contrast to when I get stuck in the first position, or even when ranked second. From the third entry, I can see this dance.
Harakterologicheskie adjectives.
How many of you know about harakterologicheskih adjectives? Think about someone with whom you communicate is difficult, a situation in which there is no creative or productive interaction. The basis of this communication is not love. It is not evident that the best that is in you. Do you feel any embarrassment. It happened to someone? Now imagine that you are in the cinema. See the man on the screen, it behaves the way he conducts himself, and give the word to describe his behavior.
"Samopogloschenny" and "aggressive".
Okay, so the words that describe it. Taking into account the information about the behavior of the person you describe it in such a way. Now Take a deep breath and See yourself on the screen in conjunction with this man. Now you are in third position. This is just information. And now you are there and behaves the way you conduct yourself. What words do you use to describe their behavior?
"Hide".
So, he samopogloschenny, and you hide.
"Defender".
They are aggressive, but you protect. Got it. Using beytsonovsky filter in this situation, we get the difference between symmetrical and complementary relationships growing. You begin to see their role in this dance. They would not receive any pleasure in doing so, without you, and you, too. Here's what the system is: Take a large piece of interaction, so that you can step back and say: "Oh, now I understand, as I dance with this man", and realize all the ways out of this dance. From this position, you may ask: "When I come back there with this information, which can create differences in the quality of the interaction?"
We know that if one part of the system begins to evolve, it is beginning to change the whole system. These positions include the perception of a whole set of other opportunities, and this is already beginning to interact with the meta-model. Consider cause-effect pattern. When I think about how the pattern seen in my life, I begin to understand the role that I play and they play and if I am accused of, or feel that I am accused, I am aware that as the interaction causes and cledstviya.
Creativity.
There is another way of using the positions of perception, which is a real fun, when you think about it in terms of creativity. Think about the work of art, which really affected you. This is not something that you just looked at him and said: "Oh, it is great!" Rather, it is a work of art that you feel very deeply. In this case, you are in the position of the viewer, describing this work of art or listening to this musical play, or watching a dance.
And Now for the position of the artist who created it. When you take this view of perception, try to use the movement of muscles, characteristic for the artist, sculptor or a composer, in order to gain access to such neuroscience in itself. And Now for the position of the artist who created it. When you take this view of perception, try to use the movement of muscles, typical of the artist, sculptor or composer in order to gain access to such neuroscience in sebe.Eto already there, you just have not stepped into this myself. For example, in the pygmy forest, who never went out and did not see the horizon. He can see the horizon, but it has never been in an environment that is conducive for eye nerves, so that he understood the difference. Items that are far from him look really tiny, so he believes that it is beetles, although in reality it is bison.
Go to the second position - a way that we can begin to stimulate a neurology within us. And then we can step back and ask: "What are the differences between those who perceive this art, and those who create it?" And "there is a difference between my beliefs when I there compared to when I here? Is there a difference in my beliefs about my ability to innovate? "I am sure that this is so. Thus, the idea of the positions of the perception is that from the perspectives of dance sets may appear wisdom. Genuine consideration of motion of my personal cards to understanding your personal card and then to an objective position in collaboration gives us the foundation of wisdom.
5. Attention.
Fifth description is relevant to look at. How do I use my mind on that, I draw their attention and how do I return it. This is a very small scale and it also occurs in very large scale, which serves us as a metaphor. As soon as I focus my attention, and large parts of the world which is disappearing, and this is due to the meta-model patterns, called Omission. So I strongly capture their attention during the course of NLP that I have concentrated only on the eye movements and lose the abyss of other information? If I was so fixed on someone's necklace, which does not notice the beautiful color of her eyes, I have to give it a disservice. And then, if I gallyutsiniruyu about this woman, based on the necklace, I can land on the island умозаключений and spend a lot of time to get out of here.
What happens if we move our attention to listen to the birds singing when you interact with people? Send Whether it's your attention to another way? Does this information to your way of behavior, which is more creative? Does this difference? If your account is in some representative system with certain submodalnostyami what happens if you change only one aspect? You can change something very small or very large. For example: here I am in touch with someone and become ... a woman from Honduras. Create whether this difference? Did you read the story "The Ghost Tolbut"? The part that I liked about the race of people who, when they are born, and fly at an altitude from which they made when they fully grow up. And then they grow down to the ground. And so happens that they never have to change perspective.
If we again will use harakterologicheskie adjectives, we can apply the idea of attention in order to see how this could create a loop relations. For example, during the interaction, I can notice what fixed my attention. In other words in the voice tone, the gesture at face value, the internal sensations. I can detect as fixing my attention on one small aspect of my interaction leads to a value judgment condition, which may make the interaction is not creative, difficult, problematic. The idea is to find what I fixed my mind to translate it into some other aspect of interaction and, of course, notice whether the changed quality of interaction in a positive direction.
This is another view of the system. Sometimes I want to break it into small pieces, and sometimes I want to look at the big picture. And in this continuum of possibilities is the place where I can begin to influence the system in a positive direction with the least effort for themselves and another person.
6. Filters
My mother, happened, told me: "Judy, if you go through life with a hammer in his hand, you'll see a great many nails". She taught me to respect the filters. If you evaluate the world in some way, you will see just that, and if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always get. Have you ever played a game, which is called "Prihlopni beetle"? When your family goes somewhere, the game is that the first who noticed Volkswagen must shout: "Prihlopni beetle!" And, of course, when you apply a filter to find a Volkswagen, they are everywhere. We were created to filter the information. A great filter could be convinced. Anything becomes possible for me, because I sort the information in some way. If I have to track only certain information, I link it with its more profound experience and I thought: "Yeah, right now I do believe". So it is important not only to consider a system of beliefs and filters, it is also important to consider the "system neverovany".
If I have a certain filter, and y have no way to withdraw our attention from the filter, then it is very easy to get a deeper experience, which will create an opinion based only on the filter. Which of the available y you tools and processes allow you to move your account, create an opportunity to ask: "What else is there?" Because of these differences will be that creates the difference. In parts of the United States is not much difference between discomfort and difference. I grew up in Oklahoma, where the attitude was so: "This is different. Stop it! "And by the time of obtaining a driver's license you are already quite well able to do so. This was a really wonderful people, but there was not much traffic filters and acceptance of differences. A world is changing.
We can talk about the "filter" philosophically. "Is it true that I can see what is happening in the world and I see only what happens in the back of the brain?" But more useful to ask the question: "Which of filters, we can refuse?" When we find edge of our maps, it allows us to know that the area extends further.
Most of us think that is beyond the edge as the discomfort, rather than thinking about it just as different. Take the difference between man, y of which the fear stage, and a man who was so scared. There are certain physiological signals for both experiences. There are certain parts that are identical, and there are other parts that vary. The ability to find these small differences in these conditions - this is the beginning reject certain filters. I see this man I so clearly, how can I, or y I already have a set of filters or hallucinations about this man?
As Don Juan y Castaneda, every child is born with the gift of vision. Every baby born in a state of nerk-nerk, ignorant ... completely open to all possibilities. Then there fovialnoe vision and language. These two great start to filter installed. This setting is the relationship between language and the outside world and what is going on inside, while the child builds this deeper structure. If the rules in the deeper structure of relevant cause-effect type, nominalizatsiya, significant omissions, over generalization, but for the child, there are natural consequences. How many of you said more than one language? Do you feel yourself in a different way, when talking in another language? This is one way that you are taking certain filters. Politics - another way, as well as religion, separation of men and women, animated and stones. What I can not see the movement of the chair, does not mean that he does not move. It means only that I do not have the staff to ensure that this notice.
You do not know what you may not know, but knowing that you can start to build the belief, which operates on a different level. If I know that I do not know, then what kind of things can I do for the movement of my filter in such a way that I was able to detect the edges of my card? As we used to say: "All you have never seen, looks like the same". In Winnie-the-Puhe is a wonderful line: "The more Piglet looked, the more Pooh was not there". Here the question is to know it and then say: "Can I arrange my life in such a way as to bring themselves to the edge, when the unknown surrounds it becomes available?"
7. Multiple description
Last Page - this is actually a description. Multiple descriptions of the world as opposed to the positions of perception. Take everything that is called NLP. As there are many other ways that I can describe it? Where can I go to get another description? Since I'm studying anthropology, I like to refer to a different culture, because y I have this intuitive guess. I have this intuitive guess that we are all representatives of the same species.
I say "intuitive conjecture", because I was still in question are New Yorkers! Perhaps this rejection of evolution! There are places where we are equal. And there are places where we differ. What makes us the same, it is that we are representatives of one species. We have the same form, y we have language, y us the same neurology. We have different ways to articulate this, different ways of talking about it, and in different parts of the world, we draw attention to different things.
Activity on the active dreams.
I will give you a useful exercise, which will allow you to experience "new coding". It came from the Native Americans called "active dreams". It's like dreams, and dreams is a way to solve the problem or to obtain pleasure. Here is the state of modeling, the focus of attention, filters, and triple the description for the collection of information from most of the reason.
1. First, set the intention, or select a filter. Say, you need to take an important decision or y you have a problem you want solved. This is something for which you are asking most of the mind to filter information.
2. Second - it enter into a state of ignorance or condition nerk-nerk. It has the following characteristics: lack of internal dialogue, vision, peripheral rather than fovialnoe, the lack of excess voltage. It's really good if you are on the system and check whether there is tension. I call this clean-up qualitative states. The idea is to go through the body and test: whether there is tension in the system and whether you want him to be there? Because when you start to try, you feel that your shoulders are raised, your mind begins to shrink, and the stronger do you try, the more it is compressed. Not everyone should be relaxed. You may need a little stress - it lets you know that you are alive, but not too much.
3. Then walk in this state. You are open to all events and are willing to notice when the outside world will offer you a character. I found that usually runs from 5 to 10 minutes before I realize a character. This symbol may be visible, or you audialnym occurs in the mud! You just made available to it. There are 2 ways to think about it. Western way - this is to say that the unconscious merely seized upon an important symbol. Native Americans would say that the universe just brought you a gift. Both of these perspectives are beautiful, but different perspectives. Remember, to go gracefully and easily.
4. Assume that the symbol is meaningful to your initial intentions, decisions or problems. Then become a symbol. Go to the second position with respect to the character. Ask yourself: "If I am a symbol of what the characteristics I have?" For example, if a tree is clearly emerged in my mind - this is my character. If I was this tree, what are my characteristics as a tree? I can be sustainably planted with flexible crown, and the birds build nests in me, and small animals come to visit me.
5. Then, go to the third position as an observer, a witness. From the third entry, note the relationship between information, which is a symbol, and your intent. How to relate this intention and symbolic information? As my thinking is changing with this information? Perhaps I have found ways to become more flexible in relation to my intent. Perhaps I have changed my perception of time, and this will be key in creating the difference.
For me the result of this activity in the detection of information. I'd like to use my conscious in order to establish intent, because that is where the problem is perceived. This suggests that the channels are open for much of the reason. It is also a means to further deepen the relationship between the conscious and unconscious.
Systemic NLP.
We can create a further description, taking "old encryption" and "new encryption" and asking what they like, and how they are different and how they interact with each other. The fact that we receive - it is the foundation of NLP systems. And I think that most of what's happening in the world, linked to the moment when the earth began to receive photographs from space. We were able to truly see the entire world, the prospect that y we never had before. We know that there are boundaries and there at the bottom of the country, the boundaries that have to cross, but from here, from a height, they are not. There is only one large continuous space. And then other things began to occur spontaneously in science, such as: chaos theory, fractal geometry, and everything else that happens in physics.
Y When you got a way to move yourself, change the filters, to notice when you get in the loop with another person, to understand that you are using harakterologicheskie adjectives when you are there when you communicate with that person, where your attention? And if you move it somewhere in another place, whether it creates a difference? In all the case. Once these descriptions are beginning to interact, you get a system of NLP, which is only beginning to develop. When I go back to the beginning, NLP is a system, one way or another. "System" means the "integral part of the mind". But then, when I start to encode it, it is not such a system. Right? Because encryption is never a part of this holistic mind. It is only then that consciousness can pull out and say: "This will provide it, and it will submit it".
Encoding. That's the paradox. Once we have something kodiruem, whether it be the system? At what level should we apply to your thinking, to preserve its systemic nature? For me it is impossible to detect any new meaning, rather it is something that we like and we have forgotten it reopen. The question is how we return it back into the body? We see how the system is distributed naturally. We see how she goes outside, and then restores the natural balance of your own way. This holistic (holistic), this system. And I think - this is the next challenge for the NLP.
HYPNOSIS
Posts
